Submit a Response
Response to:
Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise
Conway, G. 2000. Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise. Ecology and Society 4(1):2.
The following peer-reviewed responses to this article have been published:
The Elephant that is Biotechnology: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway
Ellstrand, N. 2000. The Elephant that is Biotechnology: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway. Ecology and Society 4(1):8.
Genetically Modified Organisms at the Crossroads: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway
Walker, B. and M. Lonsdale 2000. Genetically Modified Organisms at the Crossroads: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway. Ecology and Society 4(1):12.
GM Foods in the UK between 1996 and 1999: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway
Krebs, J. R. 2000. GM Foods in the UK between 1996 and 1999: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway. Ecology and Society 4(1):11.
Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway
Gadgil, M. 2000. Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway. Ecology and Society 4(1):9.
Genetically Modified Crops and the Agroecosystem: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway
Pimentel, D. 2000. Genetically Modified Crops and the Agroecosystem: Comments on “Genetically Modified Crops: Risks and Promise” by Gordon Conway. Ecology and Society 4(1):10.
If you wish to submit a response and you are already registered with the journal, follow this link. If you have never registered with the journal, please follow this link.
We welcome comments from readers that summarize data or experiences, or that review other papers or books that amplify the original article. Comments will be accepted only if factual, thoughtful, and substantive. If opinions are included, they must move the discussion forward. The Editor-in-Chief who oversaw the peer-review of this article will act as the moderator of all responses. If a response is accepted for publication, it will be linked to the original article under the heading “Responses to this Article”.
A response may be of any length, and may include additional materials such as figures or tables. Short responses (under 250 words) will be reviewed by the Editor-in-Chief of the original article. Longer responses and those that include additional material will be subject to more rigorous screening. All responses that are accepted for publication will appear as separate articles, but will be cross-linked to the original article.